This post may contain affiliate links. If you click on a link and decide to purchase an item, I may receive a few pennies that help me continue to run this site.

Wow, we have been duped all of these years…50 years now. The NY Times has issued an article explaining how the sugar industry paid Harvard researchers to point the finger at saturated fat instead of sugar for heart disease.

No, this isn’t a movie, this really happened. All of the details can be found at JAMA Internal Medicine publication. 

Here are some key elements of what JAMA concluded in their historical analysis of internal industry documents:

  • The Sugar Research Foundation sponsored its first CHD (coronary heart disease) research project in 1965, a literature review published in the New England Journal of Medicine, which singled out fat and cholesterol as the dietary causes of CHD and downplayed evidence that sucrose consumption was also a risk factor.
  • The SRF’s funding and role was not disclosed.
  • Together with other recent analyses of sugar industry documents, our findings suggest the industry (the sugar industry) sponsored a research program in the 1960s and 1970s that successfully cast doubt about the hazards of sucrose while promoting fat as the dietary culprit in CHD.
  • Sugar Research Foundation president Henry Hass’s 1954 speech, “What’s New in Sugar Research,”12 to the American Society of Sugar Beet Technologists identified a strategic opportunity for the sugar industry: increase sugar’s market share by getting Americans to eat a lower-fat diet…
  • The SRF paid Harvard researchers the equivalent of $50,000 in today’s dollars to shift the focus to fats, away from sugar.

For the future, the JAMA Internal Medicine recommends:

  • Policymaking committees should consider giving less weight to food industry–funded studies and include mechanistic and animal studies as well as studies appraising the effect of added sugars on multiple CHD biomarkers and disease development.

We will likely be seeing a lot more research and increased focus on the need to cut back on sugar or use a sugar substitute in the future.

Has other research been hidden or skewed to benefit pockets at the detriment to our health?

How will this knowledge change your sugar intake? How about the way you regard research?

Read here to find out how I beat the sugar addiction. 

 

sugar industry

 

References:
Sugar Industry and Coronary Heart Disease Research
How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat

 

 

You may also like

Why It’s Impossible for Women Over 40 to Los... Nutrition for women over 40 isn't always fun. Remember the days of being able to eat whatever we wanted, whenever we wanted? Gone are the glory days of having dessert every night and junk food all day. It's been replaced with cottage cheese. Yes, tha...
Weight Loss Guide for Women Over 40: 7 Habits that... Weight loss guide for women over 40 from personal experience. Don't get fooled by the gimmicks...this is the real 411 on weight loss.       About 4 years ago I made the decision to not be fat anymore. I had crept up to ...
Sugar Addiction: How I Broke Free If you are like me, you love sugar. I love doughnuts, chocolate, pies, cakes, ice cream - practically anything with a high amount of sugar. I had a sugar addiction. Everyone knows you can't really lose weight and eat the loads of sugar you've been ea...
Prolonged Sitting is Killing You One of our favorite leisure activities needs to be dramatically reduced...and for good reason. Prolonged sitting or physical inactivity is the 4th leading risk factor for death according to the World Health Organization.  Chronic prolonged sitting ha...

Pin It on Pinterest